Permian Basin · Now selecting pilot partners

A real stream.
A field decision.

Test whether magnetic hydrocarbon polishing can create measurable operating value on your produced-water stream—without disrupting the existing treatment train.

24 m³/day entry design · bypassable side stream · predefined scale-or-stop criteria

FIELD VALIDATION LOOP01 m³/h
INLETVARIABLE WATER
CAPTURE + SEPARATEMAGNETIC MEDIA
MEASURED OUTLETVERIFY THE TARGET

Illustrative process animation—not equipment geometry or a performance claim.

Bring a real water constraintAgree on one scoreboardGenerate a scale-or-stop decision
The pilot offer

De-risk the next treatment decision.

GELTTECH’s entry pilot isolates one produced-water stream and tests whether a dedicated polishing stage improves the metric that matters to your operation.

Entry scale24 m³/dayapproximately 151 bbl/day
ConfigurationSide streambypassable, bounded integration
DecisionScale or stoptechnical and economic gates agreed first
01

Protect downstream treatment

Test whether lower residual hydrocarbon reduces fouling or instability in the next process.

02

Reduce treatment burden

Measure chemical, waste-handling or intervention changes against the present baseline.

03

Expand reuse optionality

Determine whether a verified outlet creates access to a defined reuse or treatment pathway.

04

Recover economic value

Close the hydrocarbon and media mass balance before assigning recovery value.

Interactive pilot planner

Set the test boundary.

Use the controls to frame a first conversation. We are calculating the burden of proof—not claiming the selected outlet can already be achieved on your water.

Set the test boundary

Planning output

Your pilot decision brief

Scope model
Inlet100 mg/L
GELTTECH stage1 m³/h
Target10 mg/L
90.0%

removal required to meet the selected target

1,902

barrels planned during the test window

302

operating hours at the selected uptime

13

minimum inlet/outlet sample pairs for planning

This is a scope calculator—not a performance forecast.

It defines what the pilot would need to prove. Final sampling frequency, acceptance criteria and run plan require stream data and operator agreement.

Send this scope for review
One scoreboard, agreed before mobilization

Evidence an operator can use.

Removal efficiency alone does not establish a deployable business case. The pilot must connect water quality to reliability and economics.

WaterInlet/outlet HEM · variability · TSS · TDS · temperature
OperationThroughput · uptime · pressure drop · intervention · upset response
MediaRecovery · loss rate · reuse cycles · residuals · secondary waste
EconomicsConsumables · labor · disposal avoided · downstream value · $/bbl
A useful yes—or a fast no

Where the pilot may fit

  • Residual separable hydrocarbons create a defined cost or reliability penalty.
  • A representative sample and analytical baseline are available.
  • A safe bypass or side-stream connection is possible.
  • The operator can name the outcome that would justify scale-up.

Where it may not

  • Dissolved contaminants—not separable hydrocarbons—dominate the problem.
  • The stream has no economic consequence tied to outlet quality.
  • Solids, surfactants or emulsion stability prevent useful capture.
  • The site cannot support safe access, sampling or a technical review.
Confidential technical intake

Send the operating context—not a generic inquiry.

Required fields help us decide whether a representative-water screen is worthwhile before either team spends time on a pilot.

No advertising resale. No automated qualification decision. Technical details are used for pilot-fit review.

Produced Water Society · Midland · August 11–13, 2026

Bring us the stream that is costing you.

In 20 minutes, we will identify the operating constraint, the evidence needed and whether a representative-water screen is the right next step.

Submit your pilot brief